Home | About Us | FAQ | News  
    Assessment
 
 

Assessment Topics

 


Need for Assessment

The focus of education is on learning and the needs of learners.  Business schools and programs need to focus on students active learning and development of problem solving skills.  The following article was taken from the American Association for Higher Education website.

ASSESSMENT FORUM
9 Principles of Good Practice for Assessing Student Learning

  1. The assessment of student learning begins with educational values. Assessment is not an end in itself but a vehicle for educational improvement. Its effective practice, then, begins with and enacts a vision of the kinds of learning we most value for students and strive to help them achieve. Educational values should drive not only what we choose to assess but also how we do so. Where questions about educational mission and values are skipped over, assessment threatens to be an exercise in measuring what's easy, rather than a process of improving what we really care about.

  2. Assessment is most effective when it reflects an understanding of learning as multidimensional, integrated, and revealed in performance over time. Learning is a complex process. It entails not only what students know but what they can do with what they know; it involves not only knowledge and abilities but values, attitudes, and habits of mind that affect both academic success and performance beyond the classroom. Assessment should reflect these understandings by employing a diverse array of methods, including those that call for actual performance, using them over time so as to reveal change, growth, and increasing degrees of integration. Such an approach aims for a more complete and accurate picture of learning, and therefore firmer bases for improving our students' educational experience.

  3. Assessment works best when the programs it seeks to improve have clear, explicitly stated purposes. Assessment is a goal-oriented process. It entails comparing educational performance with educational purposes and expectations -- those derived from the institution's mission, from faculty intentions in program and course design, and from knowledge of students' own goals. Where program purposes lack specificity or agreement, assessment as a process pushes a campus toward clarity about where to aim and what standards to apply; assessment also prompts attention to where and how program goals will be taught and learned. Clear, shared, implementable goals are the cornerstone for assessment that is focused and useful.

  4. Assessment requires attention to outcomes but also and equally to the experiences that lead to those outcomes. Information about outcomes is of high importance; where students "end up" matters greatly. But to improve outcomes, we need to know about student experience along the way -- about the curricula, teaching, and kind of student effort that lead to particular outcomes. Assessment can help us understand which students learn best under what conditions; with such knowledge comes the capacity to improve the whole of their learning.  

  5. Assessment works best when it is ongoing not episodic. Assessment is a process whose power is cumulative. Though isolated, "one-shot" assessment can be better than none, improvement is best fostered when assessment entails a linked series of activities undertaken over time. This may mean tracking the process of individual students, or of cohorts of students; it may mean collecting the same examples of student performance or using the same instrument semester after semester. The point is to monitor progress toward intended goals in a spirit of continuous improvement. Along the way, the assessment process itself should be evaluated and refined in light of emerging insights.

  6. Assessment fosters wider improvement when representatives from across the educational community are involved. Student learning is a campus-wide responsibility, and assessment is a way of enacting that responsibility. Thus, while assessment efforts may start small, the aim over time is to involve people from across the educational community. Faculty play an especially important role, but assessment's questions can't be fully addressed without participation by student-affairs educators, librarians, administrators, and students. Assessment may also involve individuals from beyond the campus (alumni/ae, trustees, employers) whose experience can enrich the sense of appropriate aims and standards for learning. Thus understood, assessment is not a task for small groups of experts but a collaborative activity; its aim is wider, better-informed attention to student learning by all parties with a stake in its improvement.

  7. Assessment makes a difference when it begins with issues of use and illuminates questions that people really care about. Assessment recognizes the value of information in the process of improvement. But to be useful, information must be connected to issues or questions that people really care about. This implies assessment approaches that produce evidence that relevant parties will find credible, suggestive, and applicable to decisions that need to be made. It means thinking in advance about how the information will be used, and by whom. The point of assessment is not to gather data and return "results"; it is a process that starts with the questions of decision-makers, that involves them in the gathering and interpreting of data, and that informs and helps guide continuous improvement.

  8. Assessment is most likely to lead to improvement when it is part of a larger set of conditions that promote change. Assessment alone changes little. Its greatest contribution comes on campuses where the quality of teaching and learning is visibly valued and worked at. On such campuses, the push to improve educational performance is a visible and primary goal of leadership; improving the quality of undergraduate education is central to the institution's planning, budgeting, and personnel decisions. On such campuses, information about learning outcomes is seen as an integral part of decision making, and avidly sought.

  9. Through assessment, educators meet responsibilities to students and to the public. There is a compelling public stake in education. As educators, we have a responsibility to the publics that support or depend on us to provide information about the ways in which our students meet goals and expectations. But that responsibility goes beyond the reporting of such information; our deeper obligation -- to ourselves, our students, and society -- is to improve. Those to whom educators are accountable have a corresponding obligation to support such attempts at improvement.

Authors: Alexander W. Astin; Trudy W. Banta; K. Patricia Cross; Elaine El-Khawas; Peter T. Ewell; Pat Hutchings; Theodore J. Marchese; Kay M. McClenney; Marcia Mentkowski; Margaret A. Miller; E. Thomas Moran; Barbara D. Wright


Simulation as an Assessment Tool

Simulations allow students to learn from their own experience and to experiment with different strategies without the fear of failure.  This creates a learning laboratory where students can be evaluated based on desired outcomes.  By assessing performance at various stages of the simulation process, an instructor can evaluate the progress of students toward stated outcomes.  When simulation is used in conjunction with the presentation of new business content, it becomes an application tool.  This tool can then be used to assess learning and application of the new content material.  The BusSim family of simulations provide this application and assessment for six core business classes.

Benefits of Simulation

  1. Application of theoretical material leading to improved learning retention.

  2. Learning by experience and experimentation.

  3. Dynamic decision making under uncertainty using realistic environment.

  4. Uses technology that today's students find more stimulating.

  5. Provides assessment of learning through performance metrics that can be tracked over time.

 

 


BusSim Approach

This Integrated Business Instruction System is designed to help students understand the complex set of business relationships needed by the business practitioner.  BusSim is a set of experiential learning programs that use the same business case in a Windows based environment.  From the introductory level in an Introduction to Business class to the comprehensive level in the Strategic Management class, BusSim offers six modules of integrated assessment.  By tracking your student’s performance in these modules through measurement of business core skills and knowledge, you can assess progress in applying business decision making throughout your curriculum.

Integrated Case

Outdoor Limited, Inc. is the small manufacturing company that provides the business environment for the BusSim family of simulations.  The company begins by producing and selling one product, the OutdoorPak, a lightweight backpack for hiking.  The company was formed in 1980 and in 1984 was sold to the current owners.  The new management team was put in place and the company has grown steadily since 1984.

Outdoor Limited, Inc. started with a 10,000 sq. ft. manufacturing site and a 2,000 sq. ft. office area and employed 50 people.  In 1984 they were selling about 450,000 OutdoorPaks with revenues of $11 million and profits of $600,000. By 1992 Outdoor Limited, Inc. had expanded their physical plant by 50%, were selling a million OutdoorPaks and realizing profits of two million dollars.

Module use of Case

Each of the BusSim Modules takes the student through a different phase of Outdoor Limited’s growth.  The Introductory Module begins in 1990 with Outdoor Limited producing only the OutdoorPak.  The Module simulates the next two years of operation at Outdoor Limited.  Students begin to experience the effect their decisions have on company profits.  Physical growth is not permitted in this module.

The Finance Module also begins in 1990, but allows the student to begin to grow the company’s manufacturing capability.  Three years of quarterly operation are simulated with this module.  The student should experience the challenges associated with growth, namely cash needs, and begin to operationalize the financial statements and budgets. 

The Marketing Module begins in 1993 and simulates three years of operation.  The primary challenge in this module is the introduction of a new product and the selling of Outdoor Limited’s three products through three distribution channels.  Twelve quarterly decisions focusing on marketing mix variables are simulated with this module.  The student should experience the challenges associated with the management of increased demand.

The Operations Module begins in 1997 and simulates one year of operation.  The primary challenge in this module is the production of three products on two assembly lines.  Monthly decisions relative to all production variables are simulated with this module.  The student should experience the challenges associated with the management of the production function in this small manufacturing firm.

The Strategy Module begins in 1998 and simulates three years of operation.  Student teams are responsible for setting strategy, developing budgets and scheduling all the resources necessary to produce and sell  all three products.  Quarterly decisions relative to the enterprise and to each functional division are simulated.  Students should experience the challenges associated with the coordination and management of all the elements of this small manufacturing firm.

Financial Statements

One of the important integrating features of this instruction system is the use of a common presentation of financial statements.  This integrated display provides financial information crucial to the understanding of operating a business.  By using the same format in each module the student becomes very familiar with the integration of these financial statements.

 

Spreadsheets

Decision tools in the form of Excel Spreadsheets are provided with each module in this instruction system.

 


Outcome Statements and Performance Metrics

 


BusSim Introductory

Outcome Statements:  As a result of using this simulation, students should be able to:

  1. Describe a simple business model.

  2. Recognize the effect of basic business decisions on business outcomes.

  3. Analyze Financial Statements and their relationship to the business model.

  4. Formulate a Sales Forecast and a Proforma Income Statement.

  5. Evaluate business decisions in a small manufacturing industry.

Performance Metrics

  1. Perceived Quality

  2. Retained Earnings

  3. Cash Management

 


BusSim Finance

Outcome Statements:  As a result of using this simulation, students should be able to:

  1. Identify new business decisions available to the Financial Manager.

  2. Demonstrate understanding of a more detailed business model.

  3. Formulate Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Cash Flow Proformas.

  4. Calculate the financial ratios and apply these ratios to business outcomes.

  5. Manage cash through the growth phase of a business.

  6. Evaluate the effect of business decisions on stock price.

Performance Metrics

  1. Financial Returns (ROA, ROE and ROI)

  2. Cash Budgeting

  3. Firm Growth

  4. Stock Price

 

 


BusSim Marketing

Outcome Statements:  As a result of using this simulation, students should be able to:

  1. Identify new business decisions available to the Marketing Manager.

  2. Calculate alternative demand/sales forecasts.

  3. Institute new product introduction.

  4. Demonstrate the application of marketing mix decisions to enhance product sales.

  5. Analyze market research data.

  6. Formulate a Marketing Plan.

  7. Evaluate marketing decisions in a multi-product small manufacturing business.

Performance Metrics

  1. Financial Returns (ROA, ROE and ROI)

  2. Market Share

  3. Marketing Efficiency

  4. Forecast Accuracy

  5. Perceived Quality

 


BusSim Operations

Outcome Statements:  As a result of using this simulation, students should be able to:

  1. Identify new business decisions available to the Operations Manager.

  2. Understand the operations decisions affecting supply and capacity management.

  3. Apply techniques such as MRP, JIT and EOQ to production scheduling.

  4. Demonstrate the application of production objectives relative to cost, delivery, quality and flexibility.

  5. Formulate a Production Plan.

  6. Evaluate resource effectiveness and their application within a production system.

  7. Evaluate production decisions in a multi-product small manufacturing business.

Performance Metrics

  1. Financial Returns (ROA, ROE and ROI)

  2. Operations Efficiency

  3. Product Quality

  4. Product Delivery

  5. Production Cost

 


BusSim Enterprise

Outcome Statements:  As a result of using this simulation, students should be able to:

  1. Identify new business decisions available to Senior Management.

  2. Understand each of the elements of a complex business model.

  3. Formulate a Strategic Plan.

  4. Demonstrate the ability to function as a team.

  5. Analyze financial, market, production, labor and economic data.

  6. Present annual results and strategic direction to Board of Directors.

  7. Integrate the functional contributions to enterprise decisions.

  8. Evaluate strategic decisions in a multi-product small manufacturing business.

Performance Metrics

  1. Financial Returns (ROA, ROE and ROI)

  2. Operations Effectiveness

  3. Human Resource Morale

  4. Market Share

  5. Stock Price

 

           

Copyright [2011] [BusSim Business Simulations]. All rights reserved